From the Inbox comes this press release by Patricia Rodriguez:
Press Release: Mike Sullivan received his college degree on county time and the taxpayer’s dime.
As a Harris County resident whose family owns a real estate business, I am very well acquainted with the dramatic rise in property values and the subsequent increase in Harris County property taxes within the last year. I have also experienced how a property owner’s ability to lower their property bill is related directly with their ability to engage legal representation from a tax consultant company.
As our newly elected Mayor has expressed in a recent Houston Chronicle article concerning this phenomenon (” Drop in property values gives city bigger fiscal headache “By Mike Morris February 3, 2016 ), commercial property owners have used legal representation to lower their respective tax bills. This has helped create a inherently unfair system for the average Harris County property owners who represent themselves during initial protest hearings with the Harris County Appraisal District (HCAD). HCAD is now less likely to lower their property values and hence their property taxes increase unless they hire legal representation.
Yet in explaining the rise in property taxes, Tax Assessor and Collector Mike Sullivan cites general population increase in the county for the rise of property values and subsequent property taxes. Mike Sullivan ignores the simple fact that the recent population increase in the county has been uneven. Yet the increase in property values and taxes has been uniform throughout the county. He completely ignores the a inherently unfair system promulgated by HCAD in their property value assessments.
Harris County lacks a property tax payer advocate in it’s current Tax Assessor and Collector, Mike Sullivan. But to add insult to injury, it is a well known fact that Mike Sullivan who was elected with only a high school diploma and with little if any experience in government taxation, collection, and real estate valuation, has received his bachelors of science while supposedly working during county work time. In short, Mike Sullivan would jump on the light rail train on Main street and attend college courses at the University of Houston Downtown during normal county work hours. Mike Sullivan received his college degree in political science, on county time and the taxpayer’s dime. Keep in mind that the salary of the Harris County Tax Assessor and Collector was increased from $141,696 to $149,316 in 2014 (http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/houston/article/Commissioners-to-vote-to-raise-their-own-salaries-5194938.php_) and that it has been proposed to increase again in 2016.
As a Harris County Republican Party Chairwoman of Precinct 10, I believe it’s my duty to formally ask the Harris County District Attorney and the Harris County Attorney whether county official Mike Sullivan attending college while being paid for full time work by the county, was a legal activity. If such an activity would not be allowed for salaried full-time Harris county workers, why does it appear that it is allowed for Mike Sullivan? Needless to say, I do not believe Mike Sullivan should be the Republican candidate for Harris County Tax Assessor and Collector in this year’s November election. The residents of Harris County deserve better. In this time of skyrocketing property taxes, we deserve a qualified full-time tax payer’s advocate.
And because of prior commitments, I can’t make either one! Yikes.
Okay, the first one is at the weekly Greater Houston Pachyderm meeting.
Please join the Greater Houston Pachyderm Club for this week’s luncheon meeting as we host the last of our candidate forums prior to the Primary Election. This week we feature the races for the three Texas Supreme Court seats on the ballot. Invited candidates include:
This will be a rare & important opportunity to meet the primary candidates vying for the Republican spot on the November ticket for Texas’ highest civil court. Be informed! Join us to meet the candidates & hear from them directly about their qualifications & experience, and enjoy a fantastic 3-course lunch for just $25.
RSVP not required, but plan to get there timely as we expect a capacity crowd. … Please also note that we will not be holding a meeting next Tuesday (Primary Day), as we urge you to go support your favorite conservative candidates!
Lordy I wish I could be there to ask Rick Green why the hell he thinks he’s qualified to be a Texas Supreme Court Justice. The idea that otherwise sane people are voting for this guy makes my skin crawl.
The next one is Thursday at the Downtown Houston Pachyderm Club’s weekly luncheon.
Downtown Houston Pachyderm Club – February 25th
Please join Downtown Houston Pachyderm for our final lunch before Election Day as we host the following contested primary candidates: Hon. Mike Sullivan and Hon. Mary Lou Keel
Hon. Mike Sullivan is currently serving as Harris County Tax Assessor Collector, and is running for re-election. He previously served on the Humble ISD School Board and Houston City Council.
Judge Mary Lou Keel is serving as Judge of the 232nd Criminal District Court and is running for the Court of Criminal Appeals.
We look forward to seeing everyone for the final meeting before the March 1st Republican primary!
Why do I get this feeling that someone is going to be asking Judge Mary Lou Keel about her role in Devon Anderson’s shooting the messenger in the bungled Planned Parenthood case?
The independent, non-Big Money endorsements in the House District 150 primary race are circulating on social media and through email. In his endorsement letter, former long-time Republican Precinct Chair John Haessly correctly points (IMHO) to State Representative Debbie Riddle’s fierce and verifiable opposition to unscrupulous low-income housing developers who are attracted to grant money given by the Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs to build Section 8 housing.
John Haessly letter:
These developments typically receive a county appraisal district valuation for tax purposes that is LESS than developments that do not have this type of taxpayer-subsidized incentive.
This means more of the burden to pay the school taxes shifts to YOU, the residential homeowner.
However, don’t believe me—read the letter of opposition to one low-income housing development written by Lamar CISD Superintendent Thomas Randle.
Here’s the money quote:
“Also we are concerned that this type of development receives a valuation for tax purposes below the level of developments that do not receive incentives. We cannot support any development whereby school taxes are less than what would be received for a regular development.”
Too bad Fort Bend County residential homeowners cannot rely on their elected officials to oppose these developments.
Received in response to an open records request was this letter of neutrality from State Representative Rick Miller who chose to vote “PRESENT” and not take a firm opposing nor supportive stance on the Lafayette Park Apartments.
In this October 2014 BJP article I published the letters written by theFort Bend Chamber of Crony Commerce and the Central Fort Bend Crony Chamber Alliance in support of The Greens at Brentford apartment complex.
Mike Sullivan says it’s not his function to act as Taxpayer Watchdog Opponent
Don Sumners, CPA disagrees, says taxpayers want an advocate
Mike Sullivan, Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector cancelled his scheduled presentation before the Downtown Pachyderm Club on Thursday, avoiding his first joint 2016 Republican primary election appearance with his opponent former tax assessor-collector Don Sumners, CPA. Sumners was there to make his continuing sermon for the need of a ‘taxpayer watchdog’ as tax assessor-collector. But, on Saturday at a Cypress Tea Party candidate forum Sumners caught up with him.
Sullivan, the first to speak, After presenting a brief description of tax office functions and related statistics Sullivan stated that the most important responsibility of the office was voter registration and explained his efforts in registering voters and maintaining the voter roll. Later Sullivan stressed he considers his office to be solely that of an administrator and does not consider it appropriate for him to act as a ‘taxpayer watchdog.’ He amplified his statement further by stating that property tax matters outside his direct statutory duties should be left up to the Commissioners Court.
In his presentation, Sullivan stated that State Senator Paul Bettencourt was among his supporters. If true, Bettencourt’s position is particularly troubling as Bettencourt vigorously embraced the necessity of the tax assessor-collector acting as a ‘taxpayer watchdog’ and frequently engaged in public policy matters outside the direct duties of the office. He coined the phrase ‘tax man’ to express these activities. Now he is supposedly supporting a tax assessor-collector that has openly repudiated his policies, while supposedly spurning the opposing candidate Sumners, a former ten-year employee of his and later tax assessor-collector, who has always acted in agreement with him. Does anyone have a reason besides Sullivan and Bettencourt having the same political consultant?
Speaking after Sullivan, Don Sumners, holding high his sign featuring the words ‘Republican Taxpayer Watchdog’ strongly disagreed with Sullivan’s anti-tax watchdog position. He said that from the time he was elected county treasurer he has always held himself out as a taxpayer watchdog and has the run-ins with county officials to prove it. He particularly mentioned the attempt of former county judge Jon Lindsey to have the treasurer’s office abolished by the legislature during his tenure and his pay grade cut at the hands of the Commissioners Court. Sumners also brought up the precarious financial position of the City of Houston and the probable negative effect of continuing low oil prices on the area’s economy.
Sumners maintains that in troubled economic times his relative education (accounting, finance and economics), certification as a CPA (the only CPA to serve as county treasurer or tax assessor-collector), long standing business and 17 years Harris County government experience and his willingness to advocate on behalf of the taxpayers and engage in important public policy issues make it even more important to elect him as tax assessor-collector than ever before.
One subject of special interest discussed was the inordinate influence of the three main endorsing slates on the outcome of Republican primary elections. The matter was raised by candidates and the audience and Don Sumners was allowed time at the end of the program to discuss the operation of the slates and their influence on the outcome of the primary elections.
In addition, Mr. Sumners included this:
The Case for the Re-election of Don Sumners, CPA
As Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector
Don Sumners is running for re-election as tax assessor-collector with the objective of returning to the office as the ‘taxpayer’s watchdog’ in Harris County government. Throughout his political involvement Don has never wavered in his position as a protector of the individual citizen/taxpayer and has openly sought truthfulness, accounting and transparency in government. The wording ‘Taxpayer Watchdog’ has appeared on his material since he was elected County Treasurer and he proudly identified with the tea party movement in 2010.
Don does not shrink from promoting morality and ethics in politics, and has never accepted defeat in his efforts to accomplish his objectives. He has always been a conservative on both social and economic issues. He honestly believes that officeholders that deny the place and importance of social issues in politics, instead using politics only to seek economic gains for themselves and others, do not deserve to serve in office.
His opponent, MikeSullivan has not lived up to his pre-election promises and has failed to act as a taxpayers’ advocate as did his predecessors Paul Bettencourt and Don Sumners.
Mike Sullivan promised he would shorten customer lines, work to register every eligible county resident to vote, clean-up the voter roll, allow the use of credit cards to pay all taxes and fees and “support legislative efforts to cap property taxes.”
In all these promises Sullivan has either failed (customer lines are not shorter), touted a questionable objective (beating the bushes for voter registrants assisting those who want to wreck the integrity of the election process), has promised to do something already done (clean up the voter rolls) or has completed an objective that was well along at the time he took office (the effort to allow credit card payments at the windows was begun by Paul Bettencourt and was finally approaching accomplishment when Don left office). Most disturbing to Don, Sullivan has gone totally back on his promise to oppose excessive property tax increases. Apparently, protecting himself from the risk of disturbing the big government taxing advocates (county or city) is more important than keeping his campaign promise.
In short, Sullivan has done nothing to keep taxpayers informed of questionable county spending or budget matters, seeking legislative property tax reform or opposing continued excessive automatic property tax increases occurring because of rapidly increasing property values.
In the last few years, Don has been successful in his objective of keeping taxpayers informed of current economic and government policy issues. His analysis of City of Houston’s drainage fee proposal led to the mayor reducing the fee by giving everyone a 1,000 sq. ft. exemption. His organization of a push to increase Houston’s over-65 exemption giving the elderly a tax cut. He testified in Austin for the need to reform or abolish the Harris Co. Dept. of Education because on its mismanagement of tax dollars. Since 2012 Don has had nine Op-eds published by the Houston Chronicle. The last two, warning of the impending increases in 2015 property taxes, appeared in September and October 2015. Most recently, Don testified before Commissioners Court against the county’s proposed 2015 property tax increase of 10.5{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. Also testifying against the tax increase was a representative of Senator Paul Bettencourt. As anticipated, Mike Sullivan was a no-show.
Rather than replace Mike Sullivan, one prominent state legislator suggested subtle persuasion be used to convince him to do his job. It hasn’t worked. But, why even try it when Don Sumners a committed and qualified CPA with seventeen years as a proven leader in county government ( elected as County Treasurer, Tax Assessor-Collector and Trustee, Harris Co. Dept. of Ed.) is ready and willing to energize the office and serve as an advocate for the taxpayers interests and their desire for tax reform?
Don is already thinking about the significant possibility that the greater Houston area could experience what amounts to a perfect storm in its economy. Although Harris County is in far better financial condition than the city, it is unlikely the county will escape the financial storm resulting from the coincidence of the already pending meltdown of the City of Houston’s financial condition and the end to tax revenue increases. Hopefully the affect would not be as bad as the 1980’s downtown when the county’s finances suffered substantially.
Under deteriorating county financial circumstances, it would be very beneficial to have Don Sumners as tax assessor-collector. He stands ready to continue his prior role as the taxpayers advocate and act on property tax and other impending public policy issues during what could be very troubling times.
Don’s first memory of being interested in politics was during the 1952 presidential campaign. He remembers watching the Republican presidential convention on television with his mother when Eisenhower defeated the pre-convention favorite Howard Taft. At the time Don’s parents had several friends involved in politics, he particularly remembers State Representative/Senator Searcy Braswell and Judge Phil Peden.
Don’s first involvement in a political campaign was in support of in the election of Senator John Tower in a special 1961 election and during the same time frame becoming an assistant election judge in Austin, Texas. At the time Don was attending the University of Texas.
After graduating and moving to Houston, Don supported Senator Barry Goldwater for president in 1964 and had his first letter to the editor regarding their endorsement of Johnson published in the Houston Post.
While living in Amarillo in the late 60s, Don served as the treasurer of the Randall County Republican Party.
Fast-forwarding, Don was actively involved in the successful defeat of zoning in 1993, having served as a director and treasurer of the Houston Property Rights Association. He was also active in the successful attempt to limit the terms of Houston city officials. He filed as a candidate for City Controller in order to act as a plaintiff in the law suit to defeat the re-election of officials attempting to gather petition signatures to stay on the ballot.
In the 1994 Republican Primary Don ran for Harris County Treasurer.It was his first attempt at a Harris County office. His campaign theme was he would serve as a “taxpayer watchdog.” He defeated two other candidates in the primary to run against the democrat in November 1994 general election which he won.
During the time Don served as County Treasurer, he actively made good on his campaign promise. He was at the forefront with Dan Patrick and Orlando Sanchez in opposing the new baseball stadium because taxpayers had received no assurance that property taxes would not be used to build or maintain the stadium. It was not until the Sunday before the Tuesday vote that government officials felt forced to make a no property tax use pledge in a front page Houston Chronicle story.
As treasurer, Don also made a substantial investigation of the multitude of tax abatements that were being given to various businesses, often under very questionable circumstances. The abatements were being given to companies whom often agreed to create only the small minimum number of jobs and limited investment. Also, there was little attention paid to whether the company wouldn’t have made the business expansion without the tax abatement, the so called ‘if not for’ test. The most flagrant abuse was the continuance (non-termination) of abatements for companies who failed to create or maintain the requirements of the abatement agreement. Don was told abatements were not automatically terminated by non-compliance, but continued in effect until terminated by a vote of the Commissioners Court. Later, this abatement mess was addressed by the commissioners and the granting of abatements was greatly reduced.
During the same time frame the county was generally approving participation in the new group of TIRZ zones being created by the City of Houston. Don questioned the propriety of several of these city TIRZs. The commissioners apparently also recognized the negative long-term consequences of indiscriminate participation in the city’s TIRZs and soon after ceased to participate as often or for the full amount in new TIRZs.
Also, during his time as treasurer, Don constantly reviewed the county’s property tax actions and was not hesitant to question the transparency of the commissioner’s actions.
In 1995, Don was particularly vocal in his consternation of the commissioners for passing a “sneak tax increase.” The sneak increase was a front page story in the Houston Chronicle. He also exposed the sheriff’s spending $570,000 yearly on 50+ rented new cars at $850 monthly, supposedly for undercover work. Not true.
In addition, during his time as treasurer, Don, with the assistance of Mary Williams, wrote the ’Tax Vote 97’ charter amendment for the City of Houston, the first attempt to limit the tax and fee increases of the City of Houston. Although the campaign, courageously lead by Bruce Hotze, was unsuccessful largely because of the lies of Mayor Robert Lanier, it did make way for enactment of the tax limitation that now limits tax creases.
In 1999, Don went to work for Paul Bettencourt in the Harris County Tax Office. There he continued his service as a taxpayer watchdog begun as County Treasurer by assisting Paul in his successful effort to act as a tax and public policy activist.
In 2010 Don was elected Tax Assessor-Collector running on a Republican Tea Party ‘Tax Watchdog’ platform. During his term, Don continued to make good on his promise to represent the people as their tax policy and conservative fiscal activist. This included investigating and reporting on the Port of Houston’s questionable expenditures paid for by property taxes and the City of Houston’s worsening finances.
Don also continued the fight with the Democrat Party over their attempts to weaken voter registration requirements. He refused to succumb to the democrats demands which would be a step in their attempts to destroy the integrity of the voting process.
Don made a presentation to the Houston City Council to show that the assessment rate of the proposed ‘drainage fee’ would cost the taxpayers substantially more than the average $5 per month the mayor was touting. Don’s calculations used during the presentation became the authority for drainage fee estimates and resulted in the mayor reducing all fees with a 1,000 square foot exemption.
Don made a visit to the Harris County Department of Education in 2012 to make a presentation showing that HCDE could significantly reduce their proposed tax rate and still collect the taxes necessary to satisfy their budget. After much back and forth, the result was HCDE’s passage of a reduced tax rate.
In 2012, Don organized an effort to raise the over-65 exemption at the City of Houston. He made a presentation to council showing the tax cost of raising the exemption to various levels. With the support of several key council members he was successful and the council, led by the mayor’s yes vote, raised the exemption to $80,000.
Subsequent to his retirement from the County at 12-31-12 Don has had nine op-eds published in the Houston Chronicle, involving numerous government issues. One op-ed published on 1-7-15 questioned the closing of James Bute Park on Buffalo Bayou to build a county building. The story resulted in Commissioners Court dropping their plans. Most recently two published on September 11, and October 20, 2015, regarding the large tax increases being proposed and passed by governments, including a 10.5{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} increase by Harris County taking advantage of the tax windfall caused by increased property values. Since becoming the Harris County Treasurer, Don has had thirteen op-eds and one major letter on various tax and public policy issues published in the Houston Chronicle.
In 2014, at the request of a Bunker Hill resident, Don appeared at a city council hearing to testify that the proposed tax rate was in excess of that needed to meet the budget. The council later approved a reduced rate.
In 2014 Don was elected a trustee of the Harris County Department of Education. He was elected on a reform or abolish platform and has continued his agenda as a taxpayer advocate at the department. He admits his efforts have met with the expected resistance but he has been able to achieve changes in the monthly financial statements and improvements in the information provided with board agenda items. He and fellow trustee Mike Wolfe are slowly having an impact on forcing HCDE to improve their operational processes. They have recruited two trustee candidates for the March primary to replace two trustees opposing reform. Unlike the county, Republican trustees reduced HCDE’s 2015 property tax rate to offset the effect of the 2015’s substantial property value increases.
In 2015, Don appeared before Commissioners Court at a scheduled tax rate hearing to ask for a reduction in the proposed excessive tax rate which would increase property taxes by 10.5{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. A representative of Senator Paul Bettencourt also protested the proposed rate. Mike Sullivan was nowhere to be found.
Paid for by the Re-elect Don Sumners campaign, Rita Sumners Treasurer
1726 Creek Dr. Houston, TX 77055 713-973-7808 [email protected]
There is a lot there to digest. Don has been around a long time and has made many friends and many enemies.
I thought about simply posting this with no commentary. How about minimal commentary?
I disagree with Mr. Sumners’ position that the Harris County Tax Assessor Collector’s position should be that of a taxpayer watchdog. Sumners is correct though in saying that many, if not most, Harris County Republicans think it should be. And he is spot on in his assessment of Paul Bettencourt – Tio Pablo, when did you change? I agree with Sullivan that the job is administrative in nature.
I’ll also have to disagree about the lines being longer at the tax offices. In fact, I’ll say from personal experience that his assertion is nonsense. In Sullivan’s four years on the job, I have been to four of the offices on the Southeast side and each time I came away impressed. Not only were the lines shorter, the offices were cleaner and brighter, and the customer service level was higher.
As for voter registration, I think that both men are wrong but admit to being puzzled by Sumners’ accusations in this area. Sumners defeated former HCTAC Leo Vasquez in part by complaining that Vasquez tried to expand voter registration. Vasquez dared to hold voter registration drives in places like Barrett Station, Sunnyside, Harrisburg, etc. You know, places where Republicans aren’t supposed to go. Sumners immediately abandoned those meetings when he was elected. But I have to admit that I was disappointed that Sullivan worked with the Harris County Republican Party to defeat online voter registration. So I’m not sure if either guy has an advantage here but it certainly seems strange that Sumners would bring this up as an issue.
There is no doubt, no question, no anything that says Don Sumners isn’t a taxpayer advocate because he is. Period.
The only question is, should the office of the Harris County Tax Assessor Collector be used for that platform? Former HCTAC and now State Sen. Paul Bettencourt agrees with Sumners that it should be. Former HCTAC Leo Vasquez and current HCTAC Mike Sullivan say no, the elected official needs to run the department efficiently and focus on administrative tasks.
It’s an interesting question, one that voters in the HCRP primary are going to have to decide.
Government contracting 101: an ugly business with some unscrupulous people. So, when you wonder why Senator Paul Bettencourt quickly endorsed Bill King for Houston Mayor, think back to a time when Paul was the “Tax Man”.
In a time not so long ago sat an informal committee of creditors comprised of the City of Houston, Harris County, HISD, the Hospital District, the Harris County Tax Assessor, and various other taxing authorities. This committee’s purpose was to identify delinquent taxpayers and discuss foreclosure proceedings against these individuals.
Now, if you know anything about Paul Bettencourt you know that this was a very simple and basic concept. If you owe property tax and have not paid it, you should be foreclosed on and the taxing entities should be made whole. The fiscally responsible adults among us realize that if someone is not paying their share, the remainder is forced to make up for it.
Over the years, the Tax Man began to recognize a theme. It only took one committee member to block a foreclosure and routinely it was the City of Houston. This routine began to equate to political corruption – for the right person, the city would block the foreclosure.
Two people recognized this scheme and sought to put an end to it: the Tax Man and Bill King. At the time, King managed Linebarger, a law firm specializing in debt collection. Linebarger held the contract to collect delinquent property taxes for most of the taxing jurisdictions in Harris County.
After identifying the city’s game, King and Bettencourt joined forces to change the law at the state legislature. The change consolidated the power to determine foreclosure and gave that power to the Tax Assessor.
Bill’s firm benefited from this business, no doubt; but, Bettencourt understood that good government is good government. The process was corrupt and extremely political. King and Bettencourt became allies in this fight against corruption.
Today, the Tax Man is one of King’s biggest advocates in this mayoral race. Now you know the reason why.
Yo, Harris County Republicans, if you want to see the future of the Republican Party first hand, you need to head out to Tony’s tomorrow. The Greater Houston Pachyderm Club will be hosting Houston Young Republican President John Baucum. From the GHPC invite:
John Baucum
Join the Greater Houston Pachyderm Club as we welcome John Baucum of the Houston Young Republicans (HYRs). John is a founding member and officer of the Houston Young Republicans. He will tell us about the HYR’s grassroots work to promote the Republican party and outreach to younger voters, and the group’s activities connecting with other groups like ours.
Professionally, John works in Information Technology and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). As a GIS Support Analyst, John has an eye for detail and the creativity to solve problems. His work has also included consulting jobs at major energy companies in the Houston area. In his spare time, John enjoys collecting election data and doing spatial analysis on voting trends. Technology is a very powerful tool to build networks and spread information. GIS helps to identify areas for targeting and identifying new individuals that are ready to get involved as grassroots activists to change bad laws.
He has served as the Treasurer of the Houston Young Republicans and was a founding member and former Treasurer of the Houston Republican Liberty Caucus. He is also the current Political Director for Republicans Against Marijuana Prohibition (RAMP). John is active with many other clubs in Houston as he continues to build onto the grassroots network in Harris County and beyond. John has a passion for volunteering and works with many organizations and charities in Houston.
That short bio doesn’t begin to tell you the influence that John has had in Republican circles in Harris County. He’s one of the hardest working volunteers in the party and is very effective at communicating with all ages. I gotta warn you though, that picture makes him look a whole lot prettier than he is!
Honestly, if you are like me and very discouraged with the current Republican Party, nationally, in Texas, or in Harris County, come out and meet John. Your spirits will be lifted. The future of our party is in good hands.