Love this screen capture from Huffington Post:
Libs are going nuts as they finally realize they are waaaaay out of step with the country. Awesome.
BTW, ask anyone what I’ve been saying for months….
politics in Harris County and Texas
by Don Hooper

Last week, the citizens of Harris County learned the story of an elderly woman who has been waiting for justice for over nine years. In August 2003, a man viciously raped this 77-year-old woman who was legally blind. Immediately following the brutal assault, she was taken to the hospital where medical personnel obtained evidence samples put together in a sexual assault kit. We now know that the Houston Police Department placed the kit in the property room at the police department and no testing was performed until the kit was found this summer, nine years after the vicious rape, robbery, and her identity was later stolen. When the kit was finally tested, the evidence was connected to Wesley Gordon, no stranger to the Harris County Criminal Justice Center or system.
In a sexual assault investigation, it is regular protocol for law enforcement to obtain a sexual assault kit from the survivor. Sexual abuse exists in different forms: known and unknown assailants, child and adult survivors. Some attackers look like Jerry Sandusky while others look like Gordon. Sex offenders are teachers, coaches, neighbors, and criminals and the abusive behavior is often repetitive.
Following the timely reporting of a sexual assault, survivors undergo a forensic examination at a hospital. This examination generally includes the collection of evidence that would assist law enforcement in identifying the perpetrator: blood, urine, hair samples, photo documentation, and clothing collection. Once the examination is completed, law enforcement is responsible for submitting the kit for scientific testing. All cases with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office are directly submitted to the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences (IFS) where there is no backlog on scientific testing of sexual assault kits. This stands in stark contrast to the Harris County Sheriff’s Department who immediately takes a rape kit to the crime lab for testing.
While the story of the nine-year-old, untested sexual assault kit is nauseating, this is just one of many examples of untested evidence at the Houston Police Department. In 2011, Irma Rios, Assistant Director of the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory, said that about 16,000 rape kits sit in the Houston Police Department’s Property Room. Now, the department is reporting that 6,663 kits remain untested at the city. Regardless of the amount of untested sexual assault kits that remain untested at the city, it is imperative that all kits are immediately tested and that all usable evidence be entered into CODIS.
During a sexual assault investigation, a saliva sample is obtained from the suspect and compared with the evidence found in the kit. At the IFS, the suspect’s saliva sample is entered into CODIS, which allows law enforcement to connect the suspect in one case to other sexual assault investigations.
Sometimes, a sexual assault kit does not provide any usable evidence; but, other times, the evidence from the kit delivers the only link to the assailant. The criminal justice system owes it to survivors and our community to test every sexual assault kit and submit the usable evidence into CODIS. Additionally, the saliva samples from all suspects should be entered into CODIS, which would potentially solve assault cases and keep our community safer.
Mr. Gordon’s crime spree neither began nor ended in 2003. Prior to 2003, Gordon was sentenced to prison for Auto Theft and Burglary of a Vehicle. His criminal history also included Carrying a Weapon, Assault, Evading Detention, Possession of Marihuana, and Credit Card Abuse. Following the sexual assault in 2003, Gordon was charged with four other sexual assaults. One of the cases was no billed by a grand jury in January 2004 and the other three was dismissed in November 2004, April 2005, and November 2007. Were there sexual assault kits in these cases? If so, were they tested? When? Did law enforcement obtain saliva swabs from Gordon? If so, were they entered into CODIS?
This grave problem is not unique to Houston. In Detroit, a prosecutor is leading the effort to make certain that every kit is tested. Historically, the Houston Police Department submitted the kits to the property room and relied on the investigating officer to request testing at the crime laboratory. Once the evidence was finally tested, Gordon was almost immediately linked through evidence entered into CODIS by the IFS. Here, Pat Lykos has worked to express the importance of a regional, independent crime laboratory. This means that one laboratory, free from law enforcement control, would handle all evidence within Harris County. If this regional, independent crime laboratory were the IFS, there would be no backlog on sexual assault kit processing.
People who care about justice are hopeful that, after review of the Gordon case and others, Mike Anderson, the Republican nominee for Harris County District Attorney, will change his position in support of the City of Houston crime laboratory, whether it is under the umbrella of the Houston Police Department or the city itself. With any luck, Anderson will continue the great crime laboratory reform efforts of District Attorney Lykos. As former Houston Police Department Chief Bradford says, “Let’s do what we can to ensure that we don’t have two crime labs in Houston/Harris County, Texas.”
It is even possible that some of these untested sexual assault kits belong to cases where an individual is already accused and serving time. That was the case for Ricardo Rachell. The case was tried to a jury while the sexual assault kit remained untested at the Houston Police Department. Once the kit was tested, over five years after Rachell began serving his forty-year sentence, the results showed that the DNA matched another man – NOT Rachell.
After a number of investigative news reports about the quality of crime laboratory work at the Houston Police Department, the public crisis began. Michael Bromwich began a two-year, $5.3 million crime laboratory investigation in 2005. The investigation revealed a number of incompetent investigations and pure injustice. While Bromwich, appointed by Obama in 2010 as watchdog for offshore oil drilling, has given his approval for Houston Mayor Annise Parker’s crime laboratory proposal, I wonder if this latest example of incompetence would change his mind. It should.
We know that thousands of Texas rape kits have never been tested. These kits have been sitting on shelves in property rooms for decades. It is time to test the rape kits. New legislation passed by the Texas Legislature in 2011 requires all Texas police departments to submit rape kit evidence to crime laboratories within thirty days of collection. Senator John Cornyn is working to fund rape kit testing with federal funds.
The policy of allowing people from HPD to determine which rape kits are tested must end. A growing industry of studies to determine which rape kits to test has arisen. HPD has obtained grants for these types of studies creating a whole new industry of nonsense. It is very simple you test all the kits immediately. And, I will make a simple suggestion since this does come out of the HPD budget. HPD does not get one more dollar of overtime pay until every rape kit is tested. I am betting we will find more Wesley Gordon’s and quite possibly a few wrongfully convicted of rape. How many injustices will occur before the Houston Police Department is held accountable?
Wesley Gordon remains at large.
Whoo Hoo! I went down to the Harris County Republican Headquarters on Richmond and joined in the fun! Yeah, yeah, that’s cool. I wouldn’t have believed it either except that I was there and I have a picture to prove it!
Hey, nothing to it! No one cursed me out or anything. Look, if I can do it, you can do it! It’s really easy. They even have hands on instruction:

The entire system is automated – all you have to do is show up, log in, and start calling!
Can you help? Will you help? You have lots of choices from which to choose to spend an hour or two.
Don’t hesitate! Do your part to help Republicans sweep Harris County, Texas, and the nation!
Felicia Cravens and the Houston Tea Party Society presented an information session on the complicated, very long, Harris County November ballot Tuesday evening. They had a decent turnout for a short notice, Tuesday evening meeting, I’d guess the total turnout, including many candidates, was close to a hundred people. Political activist Neal Meyer not only moderated the event, he sponsored it, renting a huge meeting room on the top floor of the Westin Galleria hotel. Four speakers addressed the financial propositions on the ballot and then answered questions from the audience.
First up was Michael Kubosh to address the City of Houston’s Special Bond Election, which features 5 different propositions totaling $410,000,000 ($410 MILLION).

In typical Kubosh fashion, he started with a rousing “Houston, we have a problem!”, noting that Mayor Annise Parker has admitted that the city has borrowed from the pension fund to pay current operating expenses and that the city’s own long range financial report says that the City of Houston will be bankrupt by 2014. And you know what? He’s right! From the report:
This Report forecasts a deficit for each fiscal year through FY2017 in all scenarios. Even in the Baseline, assuming no additional external sources of funds are identified, General Fund cash balances will be exhausted in FY2014. (emphasis NOT added, this is from the report)
And yet, the city wants YOU to vote to give them more money to squander. And Mr. Kubosh also pointed out that, despite the Mayor’s denials that new taxes will follow, the ballot language on each of the five propositions DOES allow for new taxes:
and the levying of taxes sufficient for the payment thereof and interest thereon
Mr. Kubosh’s bottom line? Take your city back, say NO to these five bond propositions.
Next up was Dave Wilson, a longtime advocate of lower taxes and responsible spending. Mr. Wilson’s main discussion was the bond proposition of the Houston Community College system – they are asking for $425,000,000 ($425 MILLION) in new bonds.

Mr. Wilson presented a disturbing picture of HCC – student enrollment has declined 15.3{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} in the last two years and that the 40 year old system was debt free for 32 years but now has $635,000,000 ($635 MILLION) in bond debt which will rise to over ONE BILLION if the proposition passes.
He also talked about the HUGE Houston Independent School District proposition: they want you to approve $1,890,000,000 ($1.89 BILLION) to rebuild/refurbish schools and infrastructure, noting that their student population has steadily declined, from 210,000 in 2002 to 197,000 in 2011. Their bond debt in 2002 was less than $1 BILLION – if these bonds are passed, their total bond debt will exceed $4 BILLION. Voters have previously passed:
Amazing amount of debt for a declining school district.
But the worst thing that he said was that he foresaw the possibility of Houston becoming another Detroit! Yikes! Total debt for the City of Houston is close to…ready? $30,000,000,000 ($30 BILLION). It makes me nauseous just to think about that.
Mr. Wilson’s presentation (click here if your browser is not compatible with Google Viewer):
The next speaker was Houston Community College System Trustee Yolanda Navarro Flores. Ms. Flores is AGAINST the HCC bond proposition!

Rather than have me recap what she said, here is a video of her coming out against the bonds:
And the last speaker on the financial propositions was Josh Sanders representing a group called Houstonians for Responsible Growth.

Mr. Sanders urged the audience to vote YES for the METRO referendum because it extends the General Mobility agreement which requires METRO to distribute 25{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} of its tax collections to member cities and limits the expansion of rail. Here is the ballot language:
THE CONTINUED DEDICATION OF UP TO 25{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} OF METRO’S SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED PROJECTS FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2025 AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW AND WITH NO INCREASE IN THE CURRENT RATE OF METRO’S SALES AND USE TAX
This agreement and language was forged between METRO and a wide range of groups. The endorsement list is long and wide – if Houston Mayor Annise Parker and County Commissioner Steve Radack agree on it, then it is probably the right thing to do. I had to laugh when an audience member asked if there was anything in the referendum to enforce it – nope, just a verbal agreement between parties. Wanna bet we are back in the same place a few years from now?
As I was recapping the meeting, I received this cartoon from Dave Wilson – it pretty much says it all:
Bottom line from the meeting?
VOTE NO TO ALL BOND PROPOSITIONS AND YES TO THE METRO REFERENDUM
Website: VoteNoHoustonBonds.com

Public property records show the building housing Organizing For America’s Houston headquarters is owned by Gerald Womack, former district manager for U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee. The building, located at 4400 Almeda, is the location of a recently surfaced video on PJ Media and Election Law Center where a paid Obama Organizing for America director in Houston is captured assisting a double-voting scheme directed towards Florida.
Here is a screen grab from HCAD listing Gerald Womack as the property owner name (click to enlarge):
The Houston Chronicle wrote about Womack’s relationship to Jackson-Lee in this recent Housing Authority article (emphasis mine):
Womack, 54, president and CEO of Womack Development & Investment Realtors and former districtmanager for U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Houston, deferred comment on the recent concerns at the agency until he has firsthand information.
Maybe someone should ask Harris County Commissioner El Franco Lee if this is the type of expertise & knowledge the Harris County Housing Authority needs in a new Board chairman.
I’ve been to many governmental entity meetings over the years, so I can’t say that the Harris County Department of Education tax increase hearing that I attended yesterday was the worst. But it does rank somewhere in the bottom 100 or so. Good grief, these people have the power, yes POWER, to raise your taxes, take money out of your pocket, and they sat there and argued in public without seeming to know what they were talking about. No wonder citizens don’t bother to attend these things.
Let’s cut to the chase: the board of the Harris County Department of Education wants to raise your taxes by…well, there is a lot of argument about that but here is a simple breakdown based upon two of the Harris County Department of Education’s own worksheets: the 2012 Effective Tax Rate Worksheet and the 2012 Rollback Tax Rate Worksheet.

There you go: a MINIMUM of 8{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. At the meeting itself, they said 8.9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} but there are so many numbers floating around, and ways to distort them, that I think it best I stick to what they have published. Speaking of published, you’ll note that they published a notice saying that they were going to increase “total tax revenues” by 5.7{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. How do they arrive at this number? By law, of course. From the “Truth in Taxation” (now there is a misnomer) FAQ:
If a governing body — other than a school district, small taxing unit or special water district — proposes to adopt a tax rate that exceeds the lower of the unit’s effective or rollback rate, it must publish a quarter-page notice in a local newspaper to announce two public hearings.
See, they don’t use the actual rate from last year, they use the rate they calculated in that worksheet I linked to above. So they can call it 5.7{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} but it is in fact 6.3{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} versus last year. And note from my little worksheet that the increase doesn’t include the 1.62{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} increase due to increased property values, which could be appraisal creep or new construction or a combination of both.
But heck, who cares, right? No, seriously, who cares? Two members on that board sure don’t. One is a Democrat, so you sort of expect that attitude, but the other is a guy that I have supported and defended in the past. Hey, fool me a hundred times but on the 101st, I figure it out! First, the Democrat, Debra Kerner. Ms. Kerner flat out stated “I don’t care about the 8.9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}!” Earlier, she had complained that they were wasting time talking about such an insignificant increase when you look at it in terms of dollars per household or percentage of their total budget, because taxes only constitute 20{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} of the total budget anyway. Hey, at least she’s honest. Who cares about a million here or a million there when you can go get more federal grant money!
Not to be outdone, Republican Roy Morales brought some props to show just how ridiculous it is to worry about such a small increase! He held up a package of what looked like cheese crackers and said, “Look! This is all we are talking about!” And then for some reason, he held up another pack and muttered something about how we could have two.

Wow. If Republicans care so little about tax increases, we are doomed. At least the good Lt. Col. (Ret.) eats whole grain cheese crackers.
Fortunately, not all of the Republicans on the board are like Lt. Col. (Ret.) Morales. Marvin Morris and Mike Wolfe put up a good fight. Marvin stated that he doesn’t see how the board can raise taxes 6.3{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} when the economy is only growing at 1.5{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. Mike then made the point that the actual increase was closer to 9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}, for which he was attacked by Kerner and Morales. Even Board President Angie Chesnut tried to argue with Mike, thinking that he was referring to the tax rate and insisting that the increase was only 6.3{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. Mike was eventually vindicated, when the budget director did a calculation on screen and the total tax burden would be increased by 8.9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}. Again, I kept it simple in the chart above, using only the numbers provided from HCDE’s public worksheets. So my 8{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} is low and conservative but bear in mind that the members themselves disclosed that taxes will be increased by 8.9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} if they pass their increase.
And frankly, I think that they are going to pass it. Board members Evans and Henley rarely attend meetings because of personal issues, so we are most likely looking at a repeat of the initial vote, in which Chesnut joined Morales and Kerner as Yeas, with Morris and Wolfe as Nays. There is a bit of hope in that Chesnut asked for more budget documents to review. I’ll tell you this much – if they do pass this ridiculous increase, the calls to eliminate the Harris County Department of Education will grow louder and have more force behind them.
Lastly, why do I say this is a “ridiculous” increase? I mean, apart from the fact that it will raise taxes between 8-9{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986}? Because the stated reason for the increase was that they need the money for a new startup business called the “Cloud Project”. You read that correctly. In addition to the other businesses that they run, they think there is a market for a new cloud computing service. Yep, they think they can do it better than Amazon or HP or IBM or anyone else. There is scant mention of this project on their website, just three documents have references to it. The September Dollars and Cents newsletter lists it once, a one million dollar budget line. And the FY 2012-13 BUDGET AMENDMENT REPORT – GENERAL FUNDS 100-199 lists the same one million dollars budget line. The 2013 Budget Book uses the term “cloud” 8 times, and details the expected expenditures:

Do you think that government agencies should be in the profit business? Using your money for seed capital?
I certainly don’t.
Ridiculous.