Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, Democrats have intensified efforts to expand mail-in voting across Texas. The Texas Democratic Party has filed two lawsuits, one in State District Court in Travis County and another in Federal District Court in San Antonio, to allow any voter to cast a mail-in ballot. These efforts have been met with strong opposition by grassroots leaders in the Republican Party (such as Republican Party of Texas Chairman James Dickey), as well as elected Republicans at the state and local levels. Even President Trump has been vocal about his concern that expanded mail-in voting could lead to an increase in election fraud.
This opposition to expanded mail-in voting is well justified. Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, has written widely about the data showing the significant risk for fraud that mail-in voting poses. Former Congressman Quico Canseco, now with the Texas Public Policy Foundation, has also written about how expanded mail-in voting is especially susceptible to fraud in Texas.
In light of this, one would expect Republican candidates for office to be fighting for secure elections and ballot integrity. Unfortunately, Kathaleen Wall is instead using the Democrats’ own talking points on mail-in ballots to mislead voters in her campaign for the Republican nomination in Congressional District 22.
In the middle of April, Wall sent voters in the 22nd District a mailer featuring the official Texas state seal encouraging voters to “stay safe and vote from home” and stating “you have the green light to vote by mail.” The mailer further claimed the following:
“Recently, the Texas Secretary of State ruled that voters’ concerns over contracting or spreading the COVID-19 virus and endangering their health by visiting a public polling place meet the election law requirements to be deemed eligible to vote absentee.”
This statement is demonstrably false. The Texas Secretary of State has never made any such ruling. While the Texas Secretary of State has issued an election advisory regarding COVID-19 voting and election procedures, this advisory simply restated the statutory definition of “disability” for the purposes of eligibility for a mail-in ballot. This definition only encompasses a “sickness or physical condition” and at no time has the Texas Secretary State ruled that a voter who only has “concerns” related to COVID-19 is eligible for a mail-in ballot.
Around the same time this false mailer was hitting mailboxes across the 22nd District, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sent a letter to House Elections Committee Chairwoman Stephanie Klick advising that the fear of contracting a virus is not a “sickness” or “disability” for the purposes of eligibility to vote a mail-in ballot. Paxton’s letter to Klick also advises that “to the extent third parties advise voters to apply for a mail-in ballot based solely on fear of contracting COVID-19, such activity could subject those third parties to criminal sanctions imposed by Election Code section 84.0041.” An offense under this section is a state jail felony. This guidance was necessary after some Democratic officials across Texas falsely claimed, as Wall did in her mailer, that voters merely concerned about COVID-19 could and should vote by mail.
In light of this guidance from the Attorney General, Wall had to walk back her mailer and posted a clarification on her Facebook page stating that “you have to have the virus” to qualify for a mail-in ballot.
Despite knowing that the information about mail-in ballot eligibility contained in her mid-April mailer was false, and that advising voters to apply for a mail-in ballot based solely on fear of contracting COVID-19 is potentially felonious, Wall’s campaign proceeded to send voters mail-in ballot applications with the same false information about mail-in ballot eligibility contained in her previous mailer. These mail-in ballot applications were pre-populated with the voter’s name and address and had “disability” pre-checked as the reason why the voter was eligible for a mail-in ballot. All the voter had to do was sign the application, put a stamp on it, and put it in the mailbox. These mail-in ballot applications from Wall’s campaign began arriving in voters’ mailboxes last week.
Wall’s conduct in connection with these mail-in ballot applications is inexcusable. Wall is a member of the State Republican Executive Committee and is well versed in ballot security matters. In her campaign biography, Wall even touts her experience as Chair of the Election Integrity Working Group of the Republican Party of Texas. Although she has employed a cadre of highly paid consultants (campaign finance records show that she has spent more than $4.4 million so far during her campaign in the 22nd District), Wall has the ultimate responsibility for the content of the mail that is sent by her campaign.
Wall is also not a novice candidate. In 2018, she ran unsuccessfully for the Republican nomination in the 2nd Congressional District, now represented by Dan Crenshaw. Wall’s husband, Holly Frost, is still registered to vote at the couple’s $3.7 million homestead-exempt home in Congressman Crenshaw’s district.
Although I am no longer a resident of the 22nd District, I lived in the district for many years. I also had the honor of serving the people of the 22nd District as an aide in Congressman Tom DeLay’s district office after I graduated from Texas A&M. I still have family that lives in the district and they, as well as the other residents of the district, deserve competent conservative representation in Congress.
Had the Democratic Party or a Democratic candidate for public office sent mailers such as the ones sent by Ms. Wall, Republicans would rightfully be calling for such conduct to be investigated by the appropriate authorities. At the very least, Ms. Wall owes the voters of the 22nd District an apology as well as an explanation for why she sent these misleading mail-in ballot applications even though she knew the information her campaign was providing was false.
Mark McCaig is an attorney and Republican Precinct Chairman in Harris County.
UPDATE: Kathaleen Wall’s campaign also used text messaging to promote mail-in ballots for Covid-19 fears.
Pat Smajstrla says
Kathaleen Wall Is a Republican Conserative. Her mailers were sent out per guidelines of the Secretary of State of Texas about mail in ballots. As soon as The Attorney General of Texas updated the NEW Guidlines, she complied. Both times complying with Texas Regulations. This is my personal opinion. She is a Christian, has been involved with the TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN FOR YEARS.
Mark McCaig says
Pat- Thanks for your comment. I agree that Kathaleen is a Christian, Conservative woman and I respect the support she has given the Republican Party and conservative causes over the years. I am disappointed she’s resorting to misleading voters about mail-in ballot eligibility and using Democrat talking points in support of expanding mail-in ballot programs that are opposed by President Trump and other conservative leaders because of the opportunity for election fraud that mail-in ballots pose. I encourage you to read the advisory from the Texas Secretary of State I have linked in my post. Their office never released any guidelines stating that voters are eligible for a mail-in ballot solely due to concerns about COVID-19. The mail in ballot applications with the disability field pre-checked that her campaign sent out arrived in voters’ mailboxes more than two weeks after the Attorney General issued guidance stating that not only is a voter not eligible to cast a mail-in ballot solely due to a concern about a virus, but that any third-party that advises voters that they are eligible to cast a mail-in ballot when there is no legal basis for them to do so is potentially committing a felony offense. The guidance issued by the Attorney General did not conflict with the election advisory issued by the Texas Secretary of State and is in line with the plain language of the Texas Election Code.
She’s a hack who is using the Republican party in desperation to become a for-life politician. We don’t need any more like her!
Angie Chesnut says
In this article, Mark McCaig accuses Kathleen Wall of deliberately publishing misleading information. Is it possible that someone in her campaign, or even Ms. Wall herself, simply made a mistake? One can argue that she should have known better, but to make such a blatant statement that the mailer was intended to deliberately mislead the constituents of District 22, in my opinion, is quite a stretch. She did make a correction. It appears to me that it is Mr. McCaig who owes Ms. Wall an apology. I am not in District 22, but this is the kind of thing Republicans do to one another. Let’s focus on winning for Republicans and not denigrating each other so that the Democrats win.
Mark McCaig says
Angie- Thanks for the feedback. I generally agree that we need to focus on beating Democrats, but we should not do so at the expense of ballot security and the protections we have in the Texas Election Code to prevent election fraud. My comments about Ms. Wall are factual and to the extent they can be viewed as “denigrating” her it is because the tactics employed by her campaign deserve to be criticized. Part of the primary process is vetting candidates and putting their words and actions up to public scrutiny. There are two mailers at issue here, not one, and Ms. Wall is well aware of the potential for fraud that would be caused by expanding eligibility for mail-in voting. Even though the first mailer grossly misrepresented the election advisory published by the Texas Secretary of State and employed the same language about expanding mail-In ballot eligibility that the Democrats are using in their lawsuits, you might be able to make the argument that the first mailer was just the result of sloppy drafting and a lack of review. But sending out pre-filled mail-in ballot applications *two weeks after* the Attorney General specifically said that fear of the virus doesn’t make you eligible for a mail-in ballot is totally inexcusable. Even if there was not a deliberate effort to mislead, it shows an astonishing level of sloppiness and gross incompetence that should be disqualifying.
She’ll keep running for office after office until she finally gets elected even if it’s dog catcher. She’s a political hack like Beto.
Janice Kretschmar says
I will be voting for Troy Nehls.
eramthgin nightmare says
Wonder what other republican candidate started it.
I seriously doubt Ms. Walls will be an improvement over the perennial back bencher Pete Olson. Troy Nehls would be a breath of fresh air.
One more time, people – if you can wear a mask to the grocery or big box store, you can wear a mask to the polls. There’s a really good article that proves that vote fraud is happening in Harris County with mail-in ballots. Go to Texas Trash Talk dot com – it’s the lead story and they lay out clear evidence.
Carolyn Gard says
I would not vote for Kathaleen Wall ever. Her mealy mouth voice makes me cringe. I am going to do some research on Troy Nehls.