The race to replace retiring Rep. Ted Poe in CD-2 may have more ramifications in the race than simply electing a new Representative. There is an opportunity for Republicans in Harris County to move away from the pay-to-play slates that have dominated the Harris County Republican Party the past two decades, particularly the judicial races.
Ed Hubbard outlined the problem with the slate mailers in 2012 and over the years we have managed to decrease the influence of the three main ones. Unfortunately, the strategy of diluting their influence by creating more mailers might not have been the most effective strategy for getting more qualified candidates elected. For instance, the C Club, which does not accept money from candidates and which we have promoted for that reason, did not endorse a candidate in the race for Harris County Civil Court at Law 2. In that race, you have a very qualified incumbent being challenged by a wholly unqualified candidate by any stretch of the imagination. Just bizarre.
Which leads me back to the CD-2 race in which nine candidates are vying for the position. Most political handicappers are putting their money on a runoff between State Rep. Kevin Roberts and Kathaleen Wall. Roberts for his name recognition, community service and election to the Texas House and Wall for her past contributions to Republicans and the amount of money she is putting into the race.
The factor that is intriguing is that Roberts has the backing of the three main pay-to-play slates in Harris County, as well as the minor but still influential P.O.L.I.C.E., Inc. slate. I’m guessing that he picked up that backing long before Wall entered the race, otherwise the “endorsements” would be quite different. I’ll bet those guys are still kicking themselves for missing out on their share of the armored truck of money that will be thrown around by Wall.
One of the other candidates in the race, Rick Walker, has picked up on this and set up a page on Facebook called Compare TX-2 Candidates. Mr. Walker is probably handicapped in the number three or four position at this point. He is using that page to run Facebook advertising urging people to read Hubbard’s Curse of the slate mailers and we appreciate it! But he isn’t in the same ballpark with Kathaleen Wall when it comes to cash to spend.
But what if Kathaleen Wall decided to use a chunk of the money she is pouring into the race to fight the slates? Obviously, it would be targeted to CD-2 residents but she is pouring so much money into the race that she could slide a few dollars around the county and let voters know that instead of giving their votes to candidates that paid for “endorsements”, they should instead try to research the best candidates? After all, she paid $1,800 to rent a showhorse for a picture. And chartered a plane to bring in Lee Greenwood to her campaign kickoff and then paid him $25,000 to sing I’m proud to be an American. Think about the effect she could have on the HCRP primary if she put a $100 or $200 grand into an educational mailer about the abuses of the current pay-to-play slate system?
Hey, a guy can dream. And even though the idea of a candidate buying a congressional seat is repulsive to me, the tradeoff would be worth it in the long term. If she did that and if I lived in CD-2, I’d vote for her, principle be damned.
Besides, Republicans have needed someone to challenge Sheila Jackson Lee for photo ops at State of the Union speeches for years. At this year’s SOTU, she showed that she has the skills and contacts necessary to get major television time. Sitting next to the Korean dude that President Trump honored was genius! And priceless!
Lee Greenwood is leading the way in support of Kathaleen. This has been amazing night celebrating conservative values and Kathaleen Wall- a strong, conservative leader for CD 2. #GodBlessTheUSA #Kathaleen2018
Posted by Kathaleen Wall for Congress – CD 2 on Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Mainstream says
Historically, the slates have had little influence on the results of Congressional contests in Harris County. The slates supported Gene Fontenot in 1996, the voters chose Kevin Brady. The slates supported Clint Moore in 2004, the voters chose Ted Poe. The slates supported John Devine in 2004, the voters chose Michael McCaul. The slates supported Cathy McConn and Peter Wareing in 2000, the voters chose John Culberson. I think the slates supported Robert Talton instead of Pete Olson in 2008. At the congressional contest level, the voters have enough information from other sources that the slate impact is less significant.
David Jennings says
Geez Mainstream!
You had to go and reveal what we all know. These guys have no effect in high profile races. Otherwise, we’d have Sen. David Dewhurst, right?
Thanks a lot! Now she won’t spend the money to out the slates!
DJ
Glenn Rex says
I don’t like your analysis. Primary elections are the time to consider candidates for their qualifications. Particularly in a congressional district drawn to elect a republican where the primary has drawn 9 contestants. Wall is a poor choice despite her wealth because she can’t articulate a position. Too she has bought her current standing. Roberts with less than a year of state legislative experience doesn’t really bring anything more to the table than anyone else at this time. The two veterans in the race, Havens and Crenshaw, deserve more attention for their positions.
The three slates are a bad influence. But so is jumping to conclusions and influencing others without considering all of the candidates and their merits.
David Jennings says
Glenn Rex,
I wouldn’t exactly call it an analysis. More of a tongue in-cheek assessment of what I see from outside the district.
DJ
Byron Schirmbeck says
I haven’t looked at this race too closely as I am not in the district but I can say I hear her radio ads on 740 all the time and they irritate the crap out of me. Really? She’s going to campaign on wiping out Obamacare? How 2010. We aren’t falling for that again. Her ad is a prototypical example of hitting the points you have to make, hate obamacare? check, talk about shooting a gun? check, not gonna let them dang ‘ol liberals take your ammo away? check, talk about how you are like Trump but not TOO like him? check. I agree on the slates issue but I don’t care about it if it means I have to hear her ads on the radio again in two years.
David Jennings says
Byron,
Agree about those ads. If you listen to any type of political talk radio, you can’t escape them. So I tune to sports talk, which is usually boring as heck. And then I heard one of the ads on that! So it was off to 90.1 KPFT land for me, luckily it was a music show and not one of their political rants.
One would hope that if she wins, she would either get better ads or decided not to run any ads because she is the incumbent and almost guaranteed to win.
DJ
Mainstream says
I live in the district, and while it tilts Republican, Trump only carried it with 53%. If we nominate a candidate who will not answer questions, will not participate in forums, will not engage the voters except through advertising, we better hope the Democrats don’t run a good ground game this cycle.
Foolme says
True colors are shown when you have a mean look on your face as you walk out of a meeting. When you do not debate or answer any questions and let your handlers do the talking.
Sharon Hicks says
In 2000 the Link Letter endorsed John Culberson….