Site icon Big Jolly Politics

Shoreacres City Council meeting 11-25-13

It was a short meeting of the Shoreacres City Council last night but as with every one of these meetings lately, there were a couple of oddities.

5.0 Council Reports and Requests

5.2 – Alderman Moses gave an outline of the process of selecting a new police chief. City Administrator Stall will take the 58 applications received thus far and create a chart listing the qualifications of each applicant. Then a committee comprised of Stall, Moses, Mayor Webber, and interim chief Massey will evaluate the chart and do a first line cut. The second cut will be more thorough with background checks.

5.3 – Alderman Bunker was to give a report on a solution to the speeding at the curve on S. Country Club and W. Country Club. He was unable to come up with a solution so he asked interim chief Massey to come up with a list of recommendations for the next council meeting.

6.0 Public Hearings and Public Comments

No comments from citizens.

7.0 Administrative Reports

7.1 – General activity report – Stall

7.2 Financial report – Stall

The city moved $100,000 from the TexPool reserve fund to the General Fund. Stall said that this was due to the timing of deposits from the tax payments. You can find that amounts on hand in all accounts on the city website, pages 7-12. There was an increase in Sales Tax revenue of 78{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} over the previous year.

8.0 Business

8.2 – The council unanimously approved changes to the substance abuse testing policy.

Commentary

Regarding Item 5.2 above, if you will recall, a “hiring committee” for the police chief was discussed at the last council meeting (agenda item 8.3) and no action was taken. Apparently, in the time between the last meeting and this one, a committee was formed and installed. During the discussion on a proposed committee at the last meeting, citizen Diane Victor suggested adding a citizen to the proposed committee. I’m not sure how or why council or the mayor or whomever made the decision to form the committee chose to leave a citizen off of it. Or why it was discussed at city council then no discussion was had on the actual committee formation. It is yet another example of a council that came in saying that they wanted to “listen to the people” not listening to the people. I don’t know if it makes any difference or not, I’m just pointing this out.

As for the “partially” unanticipated expenditures that Stall discussed, it is yet another example of the problems with the budget that was adopted. There was no discipline involved in creating the budget in the first place and these expenditures should have been budgeted for. The radios are especially egregious – the original budget included them as part of purchasing two new vehicles. When the council cut the vehicles from the budget, Stall should have advised them about the radio situation. As a city, we keep going further in the hole and there seems to be no end in sight.

 

Exit mobile version