(Editor’s note: this column by Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colorado) first appeared on TheHill.com)
I supported the American Health Care Act last Friday because it was the right vote. I didn’t begin as a big fan, but I ended up satisfied that America needed this bill to start a process to repair our healthcare system.
Yes, I’m a conservative. I pal around with those liberty-loving Freedom Caucus guys. I get better grades on conservative scorecards than I ever received in college. And frankly, if you asked the Speaker, I think he’d tell you I’m a bit of a right-wing rabble-rouser.
I supported the AHCA, and will continue to support it, because a yes vote is the principled, conservative position.The repeal of ObamaCare stands as one of Republicans’ greatest, most enduring promises to the nation, the fulfilment of which matters to our livelihood and our country’s future. As ObamaCare continues its death spiral, families across the nation face unaffordable premiums and deductibles and severely limited healthcare choices.
Since 2010, individual premiums have gone up 27 percent and deductibles have soared. Every day, my office fields calls from families who can’t afford to pay their $12,000 deductible, effectively making them uninsured. Meanwhile, several counties in my district only have one remaining insurer in the ObamaCare marketplace.
Our mandate, our duty to the people, is to improve upon the current mess. And the American Health Care Act is an improvement, one that came with three parts.
The first part, a promising reform of the Medicaid program, should be cheered by all Republicans. The bill’s per capita allotment would force spending restraint and reform within the Medicaid system.
The next part was the actual repeal of ObamaCare, those strangling regulations of the insurance market that only help some of the people they’re supposed to help — another policy win for the conservative cause.
The final part of the AHCA was a replacement for ObamaCare, and it’s with this third part that Republicans disagreed.
I’ll be clear: I criticized the process we followed to arrive at this bill. We went too fast. We held hearings, but they were not recent and failed to create a consensus in this country. We left out important provisions.
But ultimately, this bill was worth supporting.
The president has been good to conservatives. In fact, much of his first several weeks in office have been a boon for the conservative cause: from a strong set of Cabinet picks to a rock star Supreme Court pick to a set of executive orders and regulatory repeals that undo the most dangerous parts of President Obama’s pen-and-phone legacy.
Moreover, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has been good to conservatives. He negotiated in good faith and offered real, conservative changes to the bill. We won provisions that allowed states to impose a work requirement for Medicaid and choose optional block grant fundi
ng for the program. We added a roll-back of mandated essential health benefits.
The president has earned our support. Our party leaders deserve our faith. The AHCA vote in the House would have been the first part of a three-pronged approach to repeal and replace ObamaCare, the first stop on a long journey towards a better, more conservative healthcare system. I trust President Trump to orchestrate a conservative final outcome.
In fact, we have to trust the president and party leaders, because the law requires a meandering path through Senate rules and administrative action before we can arrive at a better system.
To pass the requirements of budget reconciliation, our ideal healthcare plan had to be uncomfortably packaged into a specific kind of bill so that it only included provisions that impact the budget and not some of the key provisions needed to set up a true alternative insurance market structure. The missing provisions were already in the works in both the legislative and executive branches.
Republicans need to remember that pragmatism and principle are not opposed. Instead, pragmatism is an instrument used in pursuit of principle. By shooting down step one in the repeal and replacement of ObamaCare, we failed to achieve the principle: saving the American people from the hell that is ObamaCare.
In fact, our entire agenda of principled conservative policy relies heavily on healthcare action. Without a successful repeal of ObamaCare, tax reform will be that much harder to achieve.
Transitioning from an opposition party to the governing party can come with growing pains. But if we want to achieve our principled outcomes, like the end of ObamaCare and its replacement with a free-market system, then we have to learn how to come together as a party and govern. And governing means supporting the AHCA. I supported it, will continue to support it, and encourage my colleagues to support it as well.
No. Just no.
Repeal means repeal, what is so hard about that?
I have been voting for you guys for decades. And there has been one constant throughout….
You guys couldn’t market water in the desert.
And Ryan is BoehnerLite.
If the Republicans continue to go down this road where they forget “who brought them” and renege on their campaign promises. I’m not going to be too interested in getting to the polls to vote for them, much less campaign for them. Done.
Do Texans really need to hear this BS from Colorado? Don’t think so.
The thoughts outlined in this post by Rep Buck, are exactly what Dr. Robin Armstrong MD, and our Republican National Committeeman, outlined at the Downtown Houston Pachyderm Club last Thursday.
He had just returned from a visit to the White House to discuss the ACA, and said that it was unfortunate that the bill did not pass, because it was a great first step. The proposed revisions to medicaid alone, changing it into a block grant to the states, were earth shattering.
Maybe Rep Buck can convince members of the Freedom Caucus to reconsider their position. Granted the process followed in drafting and presenting the bill could have been improved, but it would be a shame to lose what it will accomplish.
I think the conservative republicans that were fearful there would never be a step two or three if they passed the ACA were exercising good judgement. We have had Obama Care for eight years most of them under legislative gridlock with only regulatory changes.
The As a tax accountant, I can tell you the ACA’s switching from subsidies to health saving accounts or tax credits may work for much of the estimated 85{997ab4c1e65fa660c64e6dfea23d436a73c89d6254ad3ae72f887cf583448986} of employees that currently have employer provided health insurance. But the ASA will .never accomplish the goal of providing the so called 24 million poor now with subsidies and some percentage of the employees paying for a portion of their health insurance.
Unfortunately, there is a sizable group of citizens that cannot be relied upon to act responsibly and therefore must be provided with a system that controls the funds provided for their acquisition of health insurance.
The vote may have been different if the negotiations had been held prior to rolling out the bill. Also, there has been no evidence provided that the steps two and three have been written and available for quick future action.
Just in case anyone cares what I have read of the proposed tax reform bill, most of the benefits proposed will continue favoritism of the upper upper class and the expense of the middle class.
Don Sumners:
“Unfortunately, there is a sizable group of citizens that cannot be relied upon to act responsibly and therefore must be provided with a system that controls the funds provided for their acquisition of health insurance.”
What an unmitigated load of bull offal. This kind of arrogant reasoning is what produces a smothering, should sucking nanny state. A better translation of that attitude would be: “Unfortunately, there is a sizable group of adult human beings who refuse to run their lives in a fashion I feel appropriate. Therefore I’m going to use your money to help provide what I think they need.”
Here’s an idea. Leave them alone. Let them deal with reality as adults. Most people will manage to cope, and will learn in the process.
For 8 solid years the Republican party has made excuse after excuse for why they can’t get this done. All the while claiming that “repealing Obamacare” is our number one priority. Please note the word “repeal”. That means, according to Mirriam Webster: “to rescind or annul by authoritative act; especially : to revoke or abrogate by legislative enactment.” It DOES NOT mean “come up with some hard assed modifications that will kinda make some things a little better, but overall won’t change a lot.”
My father used to teach me: “if you’re good at making excuses, you’re probably not good for much else.” and “Show me don’t tell me.” Well, Mr. Buck, you, and the rest of the Republican establishment are absolute masters at making excuses. And, you can certainly talk real pretty. But, with a majority in the House and Senate, and a President, if you can’t actually get this done – all the way done – then, you and your cohorts are worthless as a bucket of warm spit.